The eight members proposed by the PSOE and two members proposed by the PP of the Normal Council of the Judiciary (CGPJ), have prevented the governing physique of the judges from confronting the Authorities of Pedro Sánchez on the results of the suppression of the crime of sedition of the Penal Code.
On November 18, Gerardo Martínez, José Antonio Ballestero, Juan Manuel Fernández, Juan Martínez Moya, José María Macías, Nuria Díaz Abad, Carmen Llombart and Ángeles Carmona, all proposed by the PP, requested the interim president of the CGPJ, Rafael Mozo , which included within the agenda of the plenary session this Thursday his proposal on the penal reform introduced by the Authorities.
For just one vote, the CGPJ can have no say on this matter. The members wished, to start with, for the Plenary to pronounce itself “on the shortage of request for a report” in relation to the proposal to repeal sedition and, in an additional step, to debate “if, regardless of this, it could not be opportune for the Plenary to evacuate mentioned report”.
However, the plenary of the CGPJ has agreed to research subsequent December 22 the renewal of the magistrates of the Constitutional Court docket with the “dedication” to vote for candidates.
The purpose is that PSOE and Unidas Podemos offered their legislative initiative as a invoice, a system that enables not requesting reviews from the CGPJ and different constitutional our bodies that, if the invoice had been adopted, can be obligatory.
“It should be borne in thoughts that, thoughl article 561.1 of the Natural Legislation of the Judiciary (LOPJ) It solely refers to draft legal guidelines, and to not payments, European requirements require that each one regulatory proposals that have an effect on the Judiciary should be submitted to a previous report from the Councils of Justice,” argued these eight members.
As well as, they referred to as consideration to the truth that “on repeated events we come throughout vital reforms that have an effect on the Judiciary and that, as an alternative of being processed as payments by the Authorities, it’s the parliamentary teams that assist the Authorities that current within the Congress of Deputies as payments, thus obviating the processing of the obligatory report of this Normal Council of the Judiciary if it had been processed in one other method”.
The vote, held throughout the framework of the unusual plenary session held, coincides with the day that the parliamentary processing of the invoice of the political events that make up the Authorities begins within the Congress of Deputies.